The overarching purpose of What Works Scotland is to use evidence to transform public services for all of Scotland’s communities to flourish. To do this we think it is important to develop and use sound concepts and methods that will enable an understanding of what works, and what doesn’t in public services, that will also incorporate what this means for individuals and communities. We want to be able to describe the impact of any new initiative, programme, or change in the way services are delivered that analyses both whether or how an intervention works and how the changes it produces are actually experienced, reminding us to focus on what public services are ultimately for – to improve lived social justice. We need a framework that will allow us to draw on different types of evidence to capture the impact of services on the lives of people, that can be participative and allow a full range of ‘voices’ to be heard in the research.
Martha Nussbaum and
Amartya Sen have developed such a framework, called the capabilities approach.
It was designed in part to counter what Sen saw as an over-reliance on economic
data in much evaluative research. It has
been applied in a range of policy contexts, from development, where it has
underpinned the UN Human Development Reports, to analysis of wellbeing by the
Sarkozy Commission, and to equality in Britain through the Equality MeasurementFramework.
The capabilities
approach focuses on what people are actually able to do and be, such as
their genuine opportunities to be educated, their ability to move around or to
enjoy supportive social relationships. This contrasts with other accounts of
wellbeing, which focus on subjective categories (such as happiness) or on the
material means to well-being (such as income). Central to capabilities is the
recognition that whilst resources are necessary to wellbeing they are not an
end in themselves and do not, in and of themselves enable people to
thrive. In addition, people are diverse,
have different notions of flourishing, and require different degrees of support
in order to flourish. And different communities will require access to a range
of different public service activities in order to flourish, such as protection
from stigma and discrimination, feeling secure and safe inside and outside the
home, or an efficient and accessible public transport system.
We have just
produced a working paper on how others have used the capabilities approach to
evaluate public services. The paper shows how capabilities fits with the
principles of the Christie Commission and the Scottish approach to Public Service Reform. Using capabilities, we argue, will allow us
to explore how public services across key areas of day-to-day life are
impacting on people's actual wellbeing and genuine opportunities.
Capabilities have a good fit with the National Performance Framework and its
use will allow us to explore how improvements in attaining the Purpose Targets of economic growth, productivity, participation, population, solidarity, cohesion and sustainability set by Scotland Performs are affecting
the population. It will engage Scotland Performs at the community level and
help to develop a way through which public service reforms can be analysed and
evaluated.
- Read the full What Works Scotland Working Paper on What can the capabilities approach add to policy analysis in high-income countries?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.